Google discusses changes in red teaming: exercises should assess the response time implications of agents

Google's red team shares analysis suggesting that agents and automation may change the scale, speed and staffing needs of attacks, and recommends reviewing detection and response processes. The article includes forward-looking assessments and is not evidence that all attacks are already fully autonomous.

Original illustration of a timer and printed drill checklist on an office desk
Illustration · Source ↗ · About this image ↗

Source Facts

Google's red team published an article on agentic security on 13 August, examining AI's possible effects on offensive and defensive work. It discusses how automation can reduce staffing constraints in some operations, and urges defenders to consider whether detection channels and response processes are timely enough.

Google recommends introducing AI gradually into authorised exercises, first automating individual tasks with clear scope and then building reusable capabilities. The article acknowledges limited specific threat intelligence and that some content extrapolates from trends. It should not be read as evidence that a particular organisation has been attacked.

Next Steps for Businesses / Editorial Observations

Focus exercises on who receives alerts, how quickly they can confirm them and when isolation can begin. Keep all testing within authorised environments, with stop conditions and recovery methods agreed in advance.

Next steps you can take

  • Run one low-risk exercise in a test environment, recording the time taken for alerts, human confirmation and containment.
  • Define test scope, owners, stop conditions and rollback arrangements in advance, and check for unnecessary waits on manual action.

Original sources

The Evolving Role of the Red Team in the Era of Agentic Security

Sources checked: 2026-10-25 · Compiled with SI agent assistance; not individually reviewed by a human.

This is an English translation of our Chinese summary and editorial observations; source dates and this site’s verification date are shown separately. If an original advisory changes, refer to the source.

Back to news ←